|Submitter:||stwo||Created on:||2003-10-29 16:47:28|
|Status:||Open||Last Modified:||2003-11-29 02:46:36|
Tcllib has three licenses: tcllib/license.terms: BSD-style, ok. tcllib/modules/textutil/expander_license.txt: BSD-style, ok. tcllib/modules/comm/comm.LICENSE: Seems BSD-ish, paragraphs 2 and 5 seem problematic. Is there something that can be done to clean this up? Thanks, Stu
andreas_kupries added on 2003-11-29 02:46:36:
Logged In: YES user_id=75003 Stuart, thanks for reminder on this. We had a discussion on tcllib-devel about this around end of May, beginning of June this year, but it died off when I got distracted. I have now restarted the discussion on tcllib-devel. When it concludes I will post a summary here. For taking part iin the discussion please subscribe to tcllib-devel. The subject of the past and now discussion is 'discrepancy in original intent and current status wrt licensing'. A partial thread is at http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php? msg_id=5094650
stwo added on 2003-10-29 23:50:30:
Logged In: YES user_id=143350 Oops - It's paragraphs 3 and 5, sorry.