# TIP 146: Add Overall Anchoring to the Grid Geometry Manager
Author: Peter Spjuth <[email protected]>
State: Final
Type: Project
Vote: Done
Created: 05-Aug-2003
Post-History:
Tcl-Version: 8.5
-----
# Abstract
This TIP proposes to add an anchor option to grid managers to control
the behaviour of a grid where all weights are zero.
# Rationale
Have you ever found yourself adding "-weight" to an unused row or
column in a grid? That is usually the workaround to use when you have
no "-weight" on any column but you don't want things to sit in the
middle of the grid when the window is grown.
By adding an anchor option it lets the code directly reflect the
intention of the programmer and it makes the code more maintainable
since you can add and remove columns without having to update the
dummy weight.
# Shrinking a Grid
When growing a grid, the behaviour is rather simple. Follow the
weights and when 0, follow the anchor.
When shrinking a grid without weight things get more interesting.
The previous behaviour of the grid is a bit inconsistent in that when
grown it centers the slaves \(as in anchor "center"\) and when shrunk it
shows the upper left part \(as in anchor "nw"\).
Thus, following the new anchor will not be backwardly compatible, even
though I doubt it can be common for people to rely on that behaviour.
For shrinking a grid without weight there are three options.
1. Always clip the bottom/right. i.e. behave as now.
2. Clip according to anchor.
3. Try to shrink all columns/rows, and only clip when minsize stops
further shrinking. \(Clip according to anchor\)
I think 2. makes more sense than 1., but it does mean a minor
compatiblity breach. Also, with 2., behaviour 1. and 3. can be emulated
but the other way around is harder.
With 2, there are also two choises how to break compatibility depending
on the default anchor.
2. a With default anchor _center_. Anyone relying on the
bottom/left clipping will find things clip all around. Potentially an
important widget in the nw corner can end up outside.
2. b With default anchor _nw_. Anyone relying on the centering will
find things ending up in the nw corner. Probably just a visual
difference.
I can't see that any of those two are significantly worse than the other.
Finally, the question "what would you do if backwards compatiblity was
not an aspect?" clearly answers "2b",
leading to the specification in this TIP.
# Specification
A new subcommand _grid anchor_ is added. It is similar to _grid
propagate_ in that it configures an aspect of a grid manager.
The syntax is _grid anchor master ?value?_ where _value_ is a
standard anchor value with _nw_ as default.
Whenever there is extra space in the grid manager and all weights
are zero, the layout is placed within its master according to the
master's anchor value.
Whenever there is too little space in the grid manager and all weights
are zero or all columns have reached their minimumn size, the layout is
clipped according to the master's anchor value.
# Shrink example
To clarify the shrinking options here is an example.
a: Current behaviour or, "1" with anchor "center".
b: "2" with anchor "center"
c: "2" with anchor "nw"
d: "3" with anchor "nw"
foreach top {.a .b .c .d} {
toplevel $top
frame $top.f
for {set row 0} {$row < 2} {incr row} {
for {set col 0} {$col < 4} {incr col} {
set w $top.f.b${row}x$col
button $w -text HejHopp
grid $w -row $row -column $col
}
}
}
# Current behaviour
pack .a.f -fill both -expand 1
# Anchor "center" with clipping
place .b.f -relx 0.5 -rely 0.5 -anchor center
wm geometry .b 150x50
# Anchor "nw" with clipping
pack .c.f -side top -anchor w
# Anchor "nw" with shrinking
pack .d.f -side top -anchor w
grid rowconfigure .d.f {0 1} -weight 1
grid columnconfigure .d.f {0 1 2 3} -weight 1
# Reference Implementation
Not implemented yet.
# Copyright
This document has been placed in the public domain.