Ticket Change Details
EuroTcl/OpenACS 11 - 12 JULY 2024, VIENNA

Artifact ID: d28e12627d9b53cf0cee92d542a5168d83e2d45e1671555efc9d292448ad1d84
Ticket: 2c7b7487966f65976f46c44fe7c4b5aafd93d9ae
Control TLS socket server errors
User & Date: aspect on 2021-03-02 05:34:06

  1. icomment:
    This was discussed on the chat yesterday.  Errors in negotiation can be received 
    by [tls::handshake], but a bgerror is still produced.  This short example 
    package require tls
    tls::init -cadir /etc/ssl/certs -require true -ssl2 0 -ssl3 0 -tls1 0 -tls1.1 0
    proc bgerror {err} {
        puts "bgerror: $err"
    proc do_connect {} {
        set chan [tls::socket irc.choopa.net 9999]
        # ensure handshake completes
        try {
            while {![tls::handshake $chan]} {puts handshake}
        } on error {err opts} {
            puts "handshake error: $err"
            return false
        return true
    puts "synchronous code done"
    handshake error: handshake failed: certificate verify failed
    synchronous code done
    bgerror: SSL channel "sock556449741e30": error: certificate verify failed
    Note that without the call to tls::handshake, the same error will be produced 
    on first attempt to read or write the socket.
    There are calls to Tcl_BackgroundError() in both Tls_Error() and
    VerifyCallback().  The Tls_Error() invocations all come through stacked channel 
    machinery, so it *may* be possible to instead pass the error back to Tcl.  Note 
    the twapi ticket says this isn't an option there, but refers to reflected 
    channels.  I'm not sure if transchans will propagate errors from callbacks
    VerifyCallback() is called by openssl so probably not so simple.
    If extra plumbing is needed, one suggestion was to use a hash table keyed by 
    the channel ID to mark the presence of a synchronous operation that can return 
    the error.  This may need mutex protection.
    Another question when looking at the code:  it seems like tcltls requires/assumes 
    that the tls channel is the top of a channel stack.  I'm not sure this is 
    correct, since it might make sense to push another transform on top of tls.  It 
    may be worth investigating this.
  2. login: "aspect"
  3. mimetype: "text/x-fossil-plain"
  4. priority changed to: "Immediate"
  5. resolution changed to: "Open"