Many hyperlinks are disabled.
Use anonymous login
to enable hyperlinks.
| Comment: | Pulling changes from trunk |
|---|---|
| Downloads: | Tarball | ZIP archive |
| Timelines: | family | ancestors | descendants | both | practcl |
| Files: | files | file ages | folders |
| SHA3-256: |
19783bad7e94d0dcc0da28760c09933a |
| User & Date: | hypnotoad 2018-07-13 18:51:59.079 |
|
2018-09-24
| ||
| 14:05 | Updating Practcl to the latest version from tcllib check-in: 68c6d500d5 user: hypnotoad tags: practcl | |
|
2018-07-13
| ||
| 18:51 | Pulling changes from trunk check-in: 19783bad7e user: hypnotoad tags: practcl | |
| 18:51 | Updating practcl check-in: d290270581 user: hypnotoad tags: practcl | |
|
2018-06-20
| ||
| 07:17 |
Undo TEA_PATH_CONFIG changes regarding addtional paths until it's more clear where OpenBSD/FreeBSD stores it's 'official' itclConfig.sh/tdbcConfig.sh.
Fix [923f400aa03a5608]: New paths required for Darwin
Stu adds: This has nothing to do with where any one os stores itcl/itkConfig.sh. It shouldn't matter to *tclconfig* where any anything stores anything, should it? This is supposed to be a generic routine, used to pick up the *Config.sh of any extension. There is no "common store" for *Config.sh files on any platform, afaict. Extensions currently keep their *Config.sh files in their own dirs. I believe this to be the case currently for all extensions and platforms. Perhaps changing this convention is a good idea. The way things are currently, adding dirs for itcl would then mean adding dirs fors tdbc, tdom, etc.? I don't see that as being viable in the long-term. check-in: df3b672e10 user: jan.nijtmans tags: trunk | |
