TclApps Library Source Code
View Ticket
Not logged in
Ticket UUID: 1015402
Title: Add cmd to fileutil: which, a wrapper around auto_execok
Type: RFE Version: None
Submitter: certgen Created on: 2004-08-24 16:52:55
Subsystem: fileutil Assigned To: andreas_kupries
Priority: 5 Medium Severity:
Status: Deleted Last Modified: 2013-07-04 18:09:55
Resolution: Not Applicable Here Closed By:
    Closed on:
Description:
I have added a which package to the tcllib v1.4 library
we are shipping with our Quartus II software developed
here at Altera. I thought I'd submit the package back
to the tcllib team for possible consideration as a
standard tcllib package. This is a pure-Tcl which
implementation that has the same interface on
Windows/Unix (eases cross-platform scripting a bit).
There's not much too it. It doesn't support MacOS (we
don't ship for MacOS so I have no way to test it) but
it shouldn't be hard to extend to the Mac platform.
User Comments: andreas_kupries added on 2004-08-25 01:41:33:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=75003

Wrapper as fileutil::which is an idea. Renaming and
recategorizing the entry.

I agree that the name 'auto_execok' is ... non-intuitive /
non-explanatory. Historically grown, unfortunately. It came
out of the 'auto'loader and is a helper command for it.

certgen added on 2004-08-25 01:33:13:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=82268

Sure. Probably fine to close this. Unless you want to
consider wrapping auto_execok in a fileutil::which command.
I only never noticed auto_execok because, well, that command
name completely sucks. Without clicking through the
documentation on the tcl wiki page I would never have
guessed what it did from the command name.

andreas_kupries added on 2004-08-25 01:27:19:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=75003

Don't feel to bad. Nobody knows all, not even I, and that is
why things go through the review. Note that while
auto_execok is meant to do the same things it is a bit
different internally and the API, for more x-platform ability.

Should I  close this then ?

Oh, and don't let this stop you from proposing other modules
and code of yours for tcllib.

certgen added on 2004-08-25 01:16:03:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=82268

uhh...umm...well...i guess if i had read the docs for
auto_execok...i...uhh...well, probably wouldn't have written
this because they are the exact same thing. opps. don't i
feel silly now.

dgp added on 2004-08-25 00:56:59:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=80530


I agree that [auto_execok] likely does a
better job (especially when it comes to
platform differences), but if one just has a liking
for Unix-style shell commands, there's
a history of placing them in the
fileutils package, rather than having only
one command per package.

See for example, [fileutil::cat], [fileutil::find],
[fileutil::grep], etc.

andreas_kupries added on 2004-08-25 00:33:36:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=75003

After looking at the docs I have a question: The tcl core
has the builtin command 'auto_execok' which also does
searching for executables. How does your command compare to it ?

certgen added on 2004-08-24 23:52:55:

File Added - 98992: which.tar.gz

Attachments: